BETA TEST — AEUC Marketplace and connected AEUC software are under active testing and may change. AEUC Empire LLC is the current legal entity identified for AEUC; other AEUC product and division names shown here are not represented as separate legal entities. Beta details
ONLINE
AEUC Marketplace
90-DAY CREDIT ATTACK CENTERCredit Secrets-style workflow

One app. Every dispute round. Every letter path.

Built around the sequencing in the Credit Secrets material you supplied: direct creditor/collector letters first, then bureau rounds, response-based follow-ups, complaints, late-payment routes, inquiry letters, early exclusion and reinsertion review. The app uses your real report data and generates fresh letters rather than copying the book word-for-word.

90 days is the campaign window, not a deletion guarantee. The engine can push every supported correction/removal path hard, but it will not invent identity theft, claim an authorized inquiry was unauthorized, or promise that accurate negative information must disappear.

Campaign timeline

90-day attack sequence

0 report account groups loaded
D0

Lock the facts

Load all three current bureau reports, clean personal information, identify exact mismatches, and save evidence before disputing.

Incomplete / Missing Information Dispute

D1

Direct attack

Send account-specific letters to furnishers/collectors first where the facts support it. Send inquiry Letter 1 only for truly unauthorized inquiries.

Part 1 Letter 1 — Direct Furnisher / Collector Challenge • Debt Validation / Documentation Request • Late Payment Letter 1 — Direct Accuracy Review • Inquiry Letter 1 — Direct to Creditor

D31

Direct follow-up

Route each response: verified, no response, collector/original-creditor mismatch, or missing dispute notation.

Part 1 Letter 2A — Verified Response Follow-Up • Part 1 Letter 2B — No Response Follow-Up • Part 1 Letter 2C — Collector / Original Creditor Mismatch • Part 1 Letter 3 — Dispute-Notation / Escalation

D40

Bureau round

Use the direct dispute record, bureau differences, and evidence to create specific written bureau disputes.

Part 2 Letter 1 — Original Bureau Dispute • Inquiry Letter 2 — Bureau Dispute

D70

Bureau follow-up

Generate the correct follow-up based on the bureau response or lack of response.

Part 2 Letter 2A — Bureau Verified Follow-Up • Part 2 Letter 2B — Bureau No-Response Follow-Up • Inquiry Letter 3 — Follow-Up • Reinsertion Notice Challenge

D80

Escalate documented failures

Where a supported problem remains unresolved, prepare final bureau escalation and complaint drafts.

Part 2 Letter 3 — Final Bureau Escalation • CFPB Complaint Draft • State Attorney General Complaint Draft • BBB Complaint Draft

D90

90-day audit

Pull fresh reports, compare before/after, close removed/corrected cases, and start only the next evidence-supported round. Removal is a target, not a guarantee.

Early Exclusion Request • Goodwill Adjustment Request • Technical Completeness / Data Integrity Request

Letter generator

Choose the exact letter

Use when: A derogatory item appears inaccurate, incomplete, unfair, or unsupported.
Send to: Creditor / collector

Live draft

Part 1 Letter 1 — Direct Furnisher / Collector Challenge

Cortez Jermaine Campbell\n1524 Highland Ave, Alton, IL 62002\nPhone: (702) 980-7228\nDate: 10/15/2026\n\nRE: Direct dispute regarding the account at issue\n\nTo Whom It May Concern,\n\nI dispute the accuracy and completeness of information you are furnishing about the account at issue. The specific problem is:\n\nThe exact disputed fact must be entered before this letter is sent.\n\nPlease investigate the account-level records, including balances, dates, payment history, ownership, status, and transfer information relevant to the disputed field. Requested resolution: Correct or delete any information that cannot be verified as accurate and complete..\n\nPlease send the results to me in writing and preserve this correspondence with the records for the account at issue.\n\nSincerely,\nCortez Jermaine Campbell

Complete letter library